42.
expense
existing simple ruschinery would break down and be found inefficient after a considerable annual had been incurred. I think it would be for easier to make a new Ardinance on the subject of Banterupley then to amend the old
The
(which is at present confined
to Insolvency) in
the
manner and
to the extent proposed - but which
as
before remarked Its not believe
to be either nece
reecssary or desirable.
My Opinion
on
43
411
should crist a power to compel him
to do so if necessary
think it fair that
I do not
a man who is
largely indebted to others - some of whom perhaps, may have been reduced to poverty by
his defaults-
should be permitted, whilst still. in debt, to live in great style, and
to cuter into
trading
transactions
with expital which houcally and
honestly
fairly is due to others. All that I
contend for is that
the subject
have his
Mon, as
that
D
of after-acquired property is well Known. I think that in the disposal of properly it is a man's first daly to pay his debts _ and that there
far
every
onc
should
as precible, and if inconvenience should arise,
which must be met by either the
Creditor of the debtor it should be bome
or
by the latter instead of by the former.