34-
407
Insolvent than creditors of minor amount-
is
sufficient
as the maximum imprisonment
who
wire
his neighbours
and intimates on
for trading on fictitions capital unjustifiable
that their views might differ as to whether
a Composition
or a
winding up by assignes
would prove most advantageous to the -
lereditors to the interpretation clause or
-
Elsewhere in the Ordinance it should be
sherow that the terms "Creditors" and
"Meeting of Crediton "are not to apply-
Simply to Creditors who have proved their
claims, but to all creditors who from the
insolvents' books
shewn or
the Estate
or other evidence
may
be
believed to have claims against
Sec. 54. Why in Rute / shined the Insolvents
Consent be necessary
to his being tried for
a misdemeanour the doubt if
one year
Q
extravagance and contracting deblo without
expectation of being able to pay them - the
would make it līvo
years though the Maximum might rarely be on
enforced.
The practice in England
in
Ive
believe is to pay
full from insolvent Patates servants or
Clerk's wages and small claims under.
£20 or £50. Is this provided for by
any law here?
Provision Ahmed
made for the Assignees
trustees investing funds held
on account.
say at interest in an approved Bank
or otherwise so that thin may wish remain wholly unproductive while a large
omplicated Cetate is being evound up.
!