primishments necessary.
Ithinks it necessary
therefore that the offences
that render a
person
hable to flogging
should
be distinctly specified,
and I consider it the
duty of four government
gui the matter suck
to take the trouble of
consideratur & Wall
A
framing a clause in thing offenes
they
which
specified.
"shall be so
I am well disposed to rely on your local
Knowledge in respect of
the
punteft the goot is
sang langh
Ʌ
act
the particular offences
which shall be $45 punishable. Pant in
order to explain the niclination
An
of my mind I will say that
I do not shrink that
a man should be flagged
keeping or
for frequenting a gambling
House - nor
Rentence
д
~Con
the
a
Dingle
magistrate) for mere
nee at a ristous
Jpresence
Apemblage - nor for the
mere destruction.
of
thrubs and trees on public
Lands, but that I
think that he might
property be liable of Flogging