36.
to the guage-
to the Attorney General; and to Dr Meurray as also to one
or two merchants of the refusal of the application for a "Mitigation "
of
the Sentence
passed in 1857 upon three Chinese Envicts, and of the
dof
terms in which that refusal.
expressed but I did not communicate
dissatisfication
any
witho
a
me
to Mir Murrow on
connected with him
view to its insertion in any
Newspaper, and I certainly never
treated it
as
a
grievane
ance and
I
any
time,
directly
deny that I have, at
Ov
in directly- made Ar
Uburrows the ite positury of this
supposed grievance
the medium
of bringing it before the Public Secretary of State, I
that in
may
ov
251
the
add
my opinion nothing that
has occurred
dealt with
In submitting this letter for
ought to have been
37
مه
I freely admit I have
you knollency's fell your
instinctions, I
think it right myself
to state most
positively that I have never. otherwise than
courteous in
been
my
as
demeanor towards.
personally discourteous,
and I have said so in conversation
and in one
if not two notes I have
manner to Mr. Forth. writtin to Judge Adams; it
Signis) M. H. Alexander
on
this
Acting Colomial decretorn may be that my opinion
3rd May Thead has reached attr Murrow=
1882.
but I deny that I have directly
indirectly complained to Mr. Murrow!
in
this subject
to
to refer
or that I desired himi
himi
to it in any way, and I