30
3./.
35
question arises in respect of transactions in her, her commercial charnetu must prevail.
h
Your Recellency observes that
if the affair has been confined to
mercantile suit
against
the
Supercage of the Steamer on the agent whom the Continctor for the Service has at Struppong, your Recellency would not have applied to me repon a subject as natural in the mercantile laws
all
F countries - but it seems to me
the
Agent
here to
that the difficulty has been caused ity the refusal of recognize his liability or to abide
by its ordinary conséquences,
h
he bowe as the object of the Plaintiff
would have been attained.
Auglish law assumes that
[
for every wrong
there is a
semedy
"Boy higlish Law also the owner and
Master of every
on
hire
the
are the
vessel carrying cargo
responsible persons..
an aput or Supercarys would
C
not ortinarily be a
porty to
any
ant, unless he willingly accepted euch liability. In this case then
the
Agent having repridiated his responsibility, Mr Cecil the Plaintiff would have been without remedy on the love of
his property if
he
could not sue the Captain who, I have bserves, according to own
hs