J
made by M! Newman); and we
enggested that. it was important for consideration whether hot Gunshope allowed his acccounts from Janmary, 1860, to be prepared and sent to the Government withoud-contaming any entry of Conmigration Broker's Feer, in occur that he might facilitate and conceal the appropriation of theind to his over use, or whether it was, that there Fees having been so ouritten in the monthly accounts of his predecessor,
"Jul" Retrous having been made, Mr. Gunthorpe might not have followed the exptein he found in operation, under)
anov aro
ہیں
the belief that Mt Newman hand these fees
under his exparate control, and that And German)
шая
justified in directing him (as Not Gunthape assorted that he hast ome) to haved the fees over In hunself-
The received no
We have now the honor to report — that it is seen from the information contamed) in the present - papers that I although W! Newmand diot attend separately to the Cempation busmilfs,
fees from June to Wee 1859,
1859, the lecenses being granted only at the commencement of every yeard; and that Mr. Juhlis, who, encereor the excount as Aurbour Master to May.
in his Accounts 1859. melinder
foner Felinary
indudew
h
214
To Copril, 1859,
the whole.
the Fees received: of the
}
on Emigration Brokers licenses for that year,
It also appears from his Accounts sent to this office that he included a
"The Return",
When the
new licenses,
in his last account fr. May 1859. period
comme vonnor for granting (Febuary, 1800) Mr Gunthape
for,
was
in charge,
and was applied to the Lucenses of the new year, and he had the cecords of the Department showing, that on the occasion of the Creeisses granted) for 1859,
were credited in the Books of the office, and paid into the Freasury.
the fear
eve
по
Under the coamistañess, as now explawed), have to submit on opinion that-there remans no grown as for supposing that Mi Gouthape conlct) have been misled by the absence of all mention of Emigration Brokers Fees in the Clecomnts of Mr Newmans for he ought to have looked to Mi Fazlis
in which he would have former the fees on the biennes granted for 1859 brought to credit, and ought t
Accounts,
To have
questioned the propriety of any
directions from Mr Newm and (if any such had been given) to hand the Fees over to him, (Br! Newman) of any ench directions having been given by No! Narmand there is no proof, and
the Cornail, after a lengthened amor patient-
investigation