Laws could have been Committed, as was the offender not at the time of imprisonment under British rule. He added, "that he had only in his former letter dwelt on the voluntary surrender of the man to show that the man made his appearance on his own accord, and that no forcible means were employed to secure his person, and therefore British Laws were not infringed." He continued, "and to prove that the man acted on his own impulses and free from restraint while under the sole control and protection of British authority until the moment he set his foot on the 'Albe' or 'hilbe', when such protection necessarily and at once ceased, because there Prussian Authority commenced, and this cancelled the pretended rights of third parties."
Page 252