98

Government had thought fit to adopt,

be

mj. Will those two exceptions, if such they considered, all the pre-judges of consulted, declared that reasoning to be thus the facts stated to be by LHere to myself

the Report, they unanimously concurred with the minority by from the Home of the Ecomonideron and Haros

of opinions Abat etor Jelen Bickett hegre Coldwell

Voan Font I

D.M. I.

avar sinfit to removi on the Commiss wir

1. F. 17 site of the Powe? I find that to one of thinned Certificates Cop model of aprición is appended are further declaration "that the hamy Coke Caguire

nce of them thanks of the Dustices are dite to mid for having been

the means of promoting the investigation.

set by 1858 Compard

#1

The of the 36% July 1808 soi Zoupin I

The Honourable

your of the

Letter (1449) of the

150P August

adding

wapscef.

IS. The contents of the whole of these & Herz ormie. rently after being embodied m

Letter of Defence

y

xofo examedo duet cœplavation, wern pwolved m open Court and the fun adevisted on the sport of Sir John Bowrings Government. Chic Cube Pupia [11]. Beyond the bare acknowledgment of the receipt of

le Her ui question, and the mere, nihination withint reasons aforgued that this Excellency, in Executive Fom & meridges Council had not found at a "poder factory Deferred

Explimation and had pressence to proceed in the Executive Mermeil to any suspensoron; requesting me to furuishy in writing within four days pudly predication of my

Conduct, as I

inget Seen nece

· ssary, an over attempted so far as I there, to its stutensch 120. To what extort the suggested andre at ion ply thick, Revour, Ad and my Mes Coxiellarey deemed requisite, I never Reen, and I the 3rd thronefore I was in no position to

judge how for funted Heport August 1805. I ought to deem it necessary. It is crises that I was

avoured that any of the documents, which I unight '60 desvious to consult, witty a view to it, would

10 As

Arr Jevers

Avantry

Ce subunitled to me, for any perusal, at the

· Government Offices during Officine bours, But in He save day, when I went there, as informed Atis Excellence ceress to Ahir ve ilvicts I

Il vous

ANUO

I on replyz positively refused

"deorroies Are

'consult", except only in Extract I wasd to

ско

I

further informed.

12

ti t

para. 2 p.i.

_Hes Excellency, at a loss how to prepare

further

'Vindicator

of myself,

02.

even

any to understand for what materi. in partiatur

it was needed

191. This was the more uncertain, because

there was

err

not one

maturuel point contained the letter of accusation against me, that

of the 23rd July 1850, which had not been abready answered by mon

by most refuted.

I refuted by the therein ceted letters from the Commissioners

themselves

172 I confine this lust observation to pants doomed "material, because these letters cortainly left untouched the imputations of vuilevance and officiousness

in

m uner

geving my lestemory_ imputations, howeverz from the famer of which theer Report and from the latter of which Ier. Jolin Bowrings

own Warrant of Commission, hadt, by anticipation, absolved me.

(

ce

Ats to

Andy

173

the former, their treport stateles 1711 We have extended our enquiries into a "number of matters, some of which relevant

They

now appear) - (int and combined with the insreduite subject I of Enquiry, that it was not considered safe

to leave them unexamened?

were

20

Woven

land as to the latter it is not to be

begotten that I was a Government Office, and that, even if any of their questions had apprend

• to me "crelevant (which

= (which was certainly not the

case)

33

C

D

M

Share This Page