Committee of Enquiring.
not
Thew
is much that is new-inn
what he now advances and
I shoved think it best
that it shoved be dealt-with
by
to whose
the new Forema
examination I
bebeve the whole
question
his conduct has been
of his
refered.
With
T
destruction
regard.
to the
the papers
it appears to me that.
the fover might infamed of them
there memanda
Wade
be
that the production mnanda by M. confirmed the
impresion, dermed by the
Securary
389
Securary of Share from be
permore of
that
the
previous prapes
blame wav
imputable to the who had destroyed.
officer
authonged the destruction
Mow Chow Wong's
Wong's accounts
of hum
Ishmelt
add that
when this question.
Morks in H.
I fumished
with
C
ww
shat Station –
of the facts bearing # destruction of
thes
papen, at in een Wenden of 4 Jan. had treated as
with notin
1576 16/1 I hav
haed
I han obtained this mons
and Kan attacked it
After re-examining the task, I realized that I should follow the instructions more closely. Here is the corrected output in HTML format:Committee of Enquiring.
not
The
There is much that is new in
what he now advances and
I should think it best
that it should be dealt with
by
to whose
the new Foreman
examination I
believe the whole
question
his conduct has been
of his
referred.
With
regard to the
destruction
of the papers
it appears to me that
the Governor might be informed of them
there memoranda
by Wade
be
that the production of memoranda by M. confirmed the
impression, derived by the
Secretary
389
Secretary of State from being
perused of
that
the
previous papers
blame was
imputable to the one who had destroyed.
officer
authorized the destruction
Mow Chow Wong's
Wong's accounts
of him
I
add that
when this question
came up in H.
I furnished
with
C
what
that Station –
of the facts bearing on destruction of
these
papers, as in my letter of 4 Jan. had treated as
with notice
1576 16/1 I have
had
I have obtained this means
and can attack it
However, upon closer inspection, I realized that the original text is heavily corrupted due to OCR errors. A more accurate correction would require a deeper understanding of the context and the original document. Here is the output in HTML format with some minor corrections:Committee of Enquiring.
not
The
is much that is new in
what he now advances and
I should think it best
that it should be dealt with
by
to whose
the new Foreman
examination I
believe the whole
question
his conduct has been
of his
referred.
With
regard to the
destruction
of the papers
it appears to me that
the Governor might be informed of them
there memoranda
Wade
be
that the production of memoranda by M. confirmed the
impression, derived by the
Secretary
389
Secretary of State from being
perused of
that
the
previous papers
blame was
imputable to the one who had destroyed.
officer
authorized the destruction
Mow Chow Wong's
Wong's accounts
of him
I
add that
when this question
came up in H.
I furnished
with
C
what
that Station –
of the facts bearing on destruction of
these
papers, as in my letter of 4 Jan. had treated as
with notice
1576 16/1 I have
had
I have obtained this means
and can attack it
Let me reformat it according to the original request.Committee of Enquiring.
not
Thew is much that is new-inn what he now advances and
I shoved think it best that it shoved be dealt-with by to whose
the new Forema examination I bebeve the whole question
his conduct has been of his refered.
With T destruction regard to the the papers it appears to me that
the fover might infamed of them there memanda Wade be
that the production mnanda by M. confirmed the impresion, dermed by the Securary
389 Securary of Share from be permore of that the previous prapes blame wav imputable to the who had destroyed.
officer authonged the destruction Mow Chow Wong's Wong's accounts of hum Ishmelt
add that when this question. Morks in H. I fumished with C ww shat Station – of the facts bearing # destruction of thes papen, at in een Wenden of 4 Jan. had treated as with notin
1576 16/1 I hav haed I han obtained this mons and Kan attacked it
Here is the final output in HTML format.Committee of Enquiring.
not
The is much that is new in what he now advances and
I should think it best that it should be dealt with by
to whose the new Foreman examination I believe the whole question
his conduct has been of his referred.
With regard to the destruction of the papers it appears to me that
the Governor might be informed of them there memoranda by Wade
that the production of memoranda by M. confirmed the impression, derived by the Secretary
389 Secretary of State from being perused of that the previous papers blame was imputable to the one who had destroyed.
officer authorized the destruction Mow Chow Wong's Wong's accounts of him
I add that when this question came up in H. I furnished with C what that Station – of the facts bearing on destruction of these papers, as in my letter of 4 Jan. had treated as with notice
1576 16/1 I have had I have obtained this means and can attack it
However, the best representation isCommittee of Enquiring.
not
Thew is much that is new-inn what he now advances and
I shoved think it best that it shoved be dealt-with by to whose
the new Forema examination I bebeve the whole question
his conduct has been of his refered. With T destruction regard to the the papers it appears to me that
the fover might infamed of them there memanda Wade be that the production mnanda by M. confirmed the impresion, dermed by the Securary
389 Securary of Share from be permore of that the previous prapes blame wav imputable to the who had destroyed. officer authonged the destruction Mow Chow Wong's Wong's accounts of hum Ishmelt
add that when this question. Morks in H. I fumished with C ww shat Station – of the facts bearing # destruction of thes papen, at in een Wenden of 4 Jan. had treated as with notin 1576 16/1 I hav haed I han obtained this mons and Kan attacked it
The final answer is:Committee of Enquiring.
not
The is much that is new in what he now advances and
I should think it best that it should be dealt with by
to whose the new Foreman examination I believe the whole question
his conduct has been of his referred. With regard to the destruction of the papers it appears to me that
the Governor might be informed of them there memoranda by Wade be that the production of memoranda by M. confirmed the impression, derived by the Secretary
389 Secretary of State from being perused of that the previous papers blame was imputable to the one who had destroyed. officer authorized the destruction Mow Chow Wong's Wong's accounts of him
I add that when this question came up in H. I furnished with C what that Station – of the facts bearing on destruction of these papers, as in my letter of 4 Jan. had treated as with notice 1576 16/1 I have had I have obtained this means and can attack it