Law
Officers
Jupreme Court of King Aling. –
we have
In obedience to such request
perused and considered
the
Papers sulmitted to us, and have the Hend
to Report,
that we are of opinim that the Governor of Hong King: legal obligation to obey the Fut peena issued from the Supreme Court, - there is
in under
وامین چیستم برت
سلام میں
qualification. in the Subpoena Clause
of the Ordins
Ordinance
by which the court is
Constituted similar
the Governor.
Chu d
10 that in favour of
Chief Justice when they
Out f
sued for
dern and
or other matter
material
10
the
ترجم
of complaint under the Inveep Clause,
and it seems highly reasonable that if
knowledge of any facts
administration of Justice exist with the
Governor he should be bound to disclose
them.
in
i! saving all just exo
case of a refusal to attend, an attachment
exceptions) Wiether
could issue against the Governor, may be
mure
tful, we incline to think it
doubtful,
could not, as ito issue
might
be held to be
contrary to Public. Policy. – But we
my po circa OF
why he might
with the leave
not in such
#ep
0.0. Je
the Court) be sued
ریخ تے بسته
any special damages his wilful absence might have excasioned.- With reference
to the prevent case, we think when
vey ations and unfounded action
For Officer of brught against a
A vas
the
brown for acts done in the discharge of
his duty, He had
er
right to expect =
every assistance from the Governo both
in the wa
way of testimony
We are.
Sir.
and otherwise.
Your obedient Servants.
Euchard Brthell Honeys. Keating