Ji
16281
of the charge has not been brought to His Excellenceprocathodin
explanation
or otherwise no explanation
could by any possibility have been required of mer When I wrote my note) to the Attorney Heneral I simply stated two facts;
one was that Mr Caldwell
as it appeared by therland Office To Books was the Crown Lesser of Lot W2 4LB on which Lot brothel 48 stood, and that the pecuspant of on adjacent house told
an
me
that Mr. Caldwell was the pioner Freceived
the pents; therefore at
3876
refore, that time Mr. Caldwell, was the
legal peigor of Lost 20/4 1B and the houses thereon, I altho hexplained the matter to Itis Excellency by stating that he was in procces of completing a pale of this Lot to Lum Akeen. it is very clear that no other than Mr Caldwell.
could be regarded as the oconer until the tran
the transfe
signed and delivered.
was signe
a communication had to have been made by: th= Durveyor General on the
Page 390Page 391