166

23

forwarded to Lord Stauley, as a

suppleniculal Appenstive to my létter

File 17th May 1868.

(

This was not the only mistance of

the arrangeonsuits " of which d

au

- detter from the

A. C. S. of the 17th

Appender contained the bopy of the

sama offieri's letter No 272, of the

day before (18? May) The subject

complaceme. In same supplemental way ross to the

was precirely that of the alleged

the 14.

to There is not

i

AG.

Memorandum of The slightest olleesion to the Memorandumi

Dr As Contcuts. But Mere is this

ixtraordinary stateinent; that

the whole of my letter of the 13th Mnstant

" had been only perused for the first

the (br" Jet to that

" live on the cha

letter I had on the 18th received a

severe and sarcastic official

reply from him of that arte, and

on the 14.

ہے

there had been a warm-

debate about it in the Legislative

Founcil

The object of this afterthought

was to Exable the wordler to Contradict

on the

17th what he had neglected

For the Wiree preceeding days, Eläke

Any holes.

cf; & mean

8 mean my record.

of tshat had fates from his lips

in the legislative Council of the

10th May, as to the Connection Fitwcen

a dieciser of prothels and the

property license. On this subject

and upon corry contested Account

of the proceectings of the 10

aud

Share This Page