84.
ever see it used as such? "
witness
"Now? Did you ever wits an act of prostitution there?" and the like; twould not take down, nor suffer to be taken down, the previous . clear tunqualified averment of knowledge, until the seins of shaking questions had been allerhausted.
It is noticeable, by the way, that, on the same day, another witrees, Dr Rapidges,
Dr. Bridges, bendering
his
D.
• testimony in support of his own case (for Mr.foldwell's
case this own are now one)
is allowed to state - the
мрам
8561
statement was recorded
against Mr. May that the latter gentleman had been charged with some improper connivance in the case of the brothel, of the woman. Aai (the trumped-up charge before mentioned. ) I have askeds Mr. May
whether, on that occasion,
Mr. Day wasequally zealous in proesexamining D
mining P. Peridges as to his knowing, of
4
his
own knowledge, that the house was a brothel, or as to his means of knowledge,
Mr. May kelleme that