methods, how
woves it have been possible for the
Commission to fine as they have done that "Chargo
is attributable partty
to the
Two has been latisfactorily met and
explained by Report
Mh baldwell though there were
string prima
neglect of
37
537
been otherwise
Therefore, that the suault has brew othusias
erroneous methow of
Compiling the charges; hut partly for to the
the Commission to Conect and reduce them.
1 facie, grounds for bringing it;
And so
for th
But there
were other Canses.
with
respect
to the other chargos' in the same
・group.
I
Repent
Cannot
agree
و
specify this one instance. For brevity's
'great
latitude as
to the kind of
that they allow themselves evidence they
sake I at present specify.
no more But I extens
Heis Excellency to my
of the Charges
alluded to by the Commission
my application of it to every one
deausible in
any
what I wrote on
shape however diafigures, from
the 13th May last or subsequently,
fans I say that, when fairly
thew is not one
and
rationally stated
which is not established by these
Minutes of Evidence,
wil lee
So statio, wil
by the Repent,
ana
not
one
which, when
forma
I have been condemned)
Therefore
proteat
of the 14th June 1868
'Admitted"), and I refer
peretest on the subject"
letter of love no in this portion of then Report. Never were rules evisened at law so tightened by a bout of Lacr
of
مى
by this Commission, celbeit not ties or bound
by any
tuleo
of
evidence whatever; beyond the only
general rule that, for the pampese of docutaining
the truth of a
Nature
of
a case, the best evidence which the
that case admitõ
of,
is to be received.
The