34
I have thus much to
say of
both documents.
The Report in finding, auth limitaliono, expressia, certain of the Charges to be true, havin
fact protanto reatored that portion of my
Statements
to which the charges
wew
supposed to refor:-
I in their limitia shape, I adopt them.
and,
It is now
forma for
iistance to be
quite
ties that a long
between
that they
in
got
ou
pirate
wew in.
and intimate Connection' existed
and
the Registrar General Report.
partnerships in a
-
Sorcha that,
the arrect of the former for foiracy the latter
him out
of prison upon bail, selecting his
own
former servant, then latily in frison for debt, to be the bail, and that, in the case of another pirate,
justice
was
actually-defranded of her victim
by the in comprehensible interposition of Mr.
loved wew
inutes of Evidenc
the 27th & 28th May
$12 + 16th June.
$130.21.24-27.
By Letters &ea
Caldwell, to the misleading of a magistrate.
with
536
If other charges` how been as caufully Collatio.
my own original statements
as were these, I have
no doubt that they too womew have been frena to be
true with the like limitations.
Ihns,
for
instance, if the Commission hav`
24. 27. been lea to enguine whether Mr. Caldwell has not connected.
1 the 13th 17th.
may
1858.
property,
since he became
himself with licensed brothil license of brothels, by allowing himself to be reported
their owner,
by permitting it to stana in hie name
in the books of the Land office
and
the Treasury,
by entertaining applications from the tenant about
repain
Rents
the like, by payment of the Crown by receipt of rack rents (which
and
was all that I ever
this subject.) or by
charges against him expen
Rome one or more
of these
Methods
?
Page 540Page 541
BY