18
with
regard
to that List of Charges,
and to the
Setter of
the 34
Abay 1858
consequences arising from the Circumstances of my
proteck remaining
unheeded by. His Excellency,
and
their being
caluca upon by the terms of their
Commission to
famane
the tens of those charges;
notwithstanding my protect
"lee have, they say, "experienced great-
Marth
• difficultly.
in om
'Arrangement,
and
labors,
firat from
from the nature, Report
wording of the charges,
∙of which it appeared unnecessary
"was most distasteful for
into-
and
-as
Rome
mecessary as it certainly
the Commission to enquind
and of
variant. Commission
Report
minutes of evidenc
and 30
the 291 Jure and 9th Inly
I especially from the refusal of the minutes of Soison 1988, pp. 520. 61.
'Attorney Genual
the charges
to aet
get as
as accuser or
of the 27th 128
and 17
Letter 1858 and
to recognize may ask. Libr
as his charges, thear in fact having
been from the first utterly repudiated by me
In comarquence, they report that they
Considere
Proteat
the Acting Colon Sellers of
Of the 2 of the 80 and Secutary to June 1858′′
May
Considera it advisable, to engage
Day
luere so
528
the
services of eller
to act as Examiner ? and doubtless they
so empowers to do by an expres clance inentide
by-aw
into their Warrant of Commission for that purpose.
But it is an
unhappy fact that Mr-Day was then
Knoww to have been Counsel for Mah-chow
at his trial, to have labored
zealously
wing
with allr
baldwell for his pardow after his conviction of Counsel for the
Piracy.
anw
to have acted as
Pawnbroker too, whose case is mentioned in the
Report
ano
it was um
dw
his
advice),
Meerssarily
biassen by these cricumstances, that the Commation
ever
no acted in
afterwards
exclusion of
Evidence).
the admission
---
I have, under these ci eumstanew, to submit-
to His Excellency that I Neither preferen
the
'Charges'