8
with
am
523
explanation
their
Inquiry.
Nor is their capricious change of
mo
瓜
}
to furnish kim
in
writing
pmpose (after
the termination
of
their labors withal)
any
why His Exalteney's
And I will lastly.
Crave
again
24th instant, that I be
printed copy of
"Orden' of the furnished
Letter
or defence of my conduct.
Hois Excellenajs
24 July 1850 (other + (6881) appreciation of the following spessages from my above
w with a
Letter tem poli
1st July 1859
citia letter
the Evidence taken, shonew be
theas disobeyed or thwarted in the excention; it being
in this Exetency's power to compel Obediences, and
it not being posible for heim, tite less
Excortive bemnal.
for
the
the
lemmel, and least of all for
Secretary of state or the public to comprehena
that portion of the evidence which
hrax
given orally.
without collating therewith "the
a
accompanying
documents"
I
May
documents that
add that it is to these accompanying
you already quotes official of the Setter yea
(4°433)
2004 instant distinctly refers me for a portion of the 28 July 1857 Matter with respect to which "His Exatuney desires
Me
205-3
Letters of Protest If the 8ht and 1447
June 1858.
ono
of
the 28th instant, in theirs bearing upon
portion of the presents question: -
'Some
referred to in
numbers
of
"those accompanying do enments' are
the Mimatio of Evidence and Report without
or marks; and,
Specify my
amongst these, I have to
livo letters, of Protest addressed to the
Chairman of the Commissio
f
are referred to by letters
from
others
again
}
A to R both inclusive.
'Of Several of the documents of either class
'I had never heard befow reading the minutes of
'evidened last night
and
this
morning.
'bew many days during which I
was
there having!
not present
379
at