505
9.
were some
Amongst the cases Engined int the result of which, if substantiated, much have been the prosecution of the Caldwell on charges of piracy and piracy & Murder
not say where
unde
but rather
Pases
was the Messity
it not cruel in such
affecting
a Man's
hearsay
Evidence - I
life
ro-to
blatto
laken though
worth leoness it conea haven
its utter wor the leas
Made No
impressim.
I concur
with the Commissioners in saying
met and
m
that charge 2 has been satisfactorily explained by Mr Caldwell but not that there
existed Story frima facie grounds for bringing t. At the time the Attorney General first
preferred
Charze
}
ation is
it is only afbe the charge is made that the Bucks of the Treasury and Sans offin an thenight of and sent for alle allays information Mr. partly gathered from the mere heaway statement of a neighbour of the occupant of the house
in question
and in his version
of what look plow
is antrasiska both by his informant
contradicts
his
Awn
Servant,
Ank
parkly from
^ Berth (when
appear!
the
registond
made or be what time Correctia does not
) which mentions Mr. Caldwell as
*
owner at the time of its = Compilation. Was the Atton on General
been.
so devirens of Eliciting the truth as he
: of finding
matten Criminatory of ell
umed have made
Enguing before preferring
such a charge.
with the Commission that
Caldwell he
Miller
he has in support of it
solely the letter of at they the makes
no enquiry
assertion
to ascertain the truth of the
his
neano
of information.
and
it
for ther
Chaye 4
agree
is not proved. So
My
Min &
it
diefremmed for it was evident that Mr. Inglis has fallen into the grissons
Mistakes
359