10.
may
ваш
Broks. Ups to this period whatever my opinion of his precipitancy in jumping at
Conclusions and
whatevi I
may think
think of the
Conduct of his informant (ell May)
M. Austry Catainly baw a prime fancies. Case apparently established
Caldwel
against Mr.
and alth; this forema facie
Edwell and
Case wed
have disappeared upon investigation
No one emen wel have blames Mr
Anstey for relying upon the information
Superintendent
of the
the records
b
of
tendent of Poliev
ppendiy N.7. baldwell's
13th 1888
how
fucts really
#.
Atood with
342
of information for the
to elle lealdwell owning any property and
regari exficcially any
brothels
and ally. baldwell's letter
the 13th May and my son report zatiafin this
Excellency that the schole charge was banen a/pow a mistadio originating in legal delays in the
transfer of property.
It is an imfatornate firentianty of cllor.
Anelij's otherwise
very
once it has received a
logical mina that if
bias he does
and)
to aaw to the force
in
the
the Crown Books in preference
-othie statements. After what have
any athw
bccurred at the Council of the 10th His
Exettiny
desired me to as curtain
baldwell in writing
writing and from
athw
from ells.
Soras...
of
Original
every thing
direction:
without stopping to Examine whether there
may not be a counteracting power the other way
developed.
and
this was now
Strikingly
Mr. Anstey dia not- Care
to examine whether Mr. May's information
E
might
:
¿
11
נ
ปี