A
" The Cedony he has been engaged in
leng - succession of officialized -quarrels and contentions with. -publes functionaries - That these standings have been
ot
Like
desperatch no. 104 of
2. That en
a
323
& former. rccasion when the
Governor was instructed to suspend (M=
Extract from Bhole hell of 24 January /di Lecretury from Extract from keleriusfeatch: Secretary's Letter of 18 August 1856, from 1836. to Mr. Mitchell Secretary of State. Covernor & Exshathe Nr 21 of 12 December to Secretary of State Governor I Beshak
misunderstandings characterized by unwarrantably vident and vituperative language on the part of Mr. Anstey, have been
Nr 25 of 11 Februars Bit
detrimental to the character offer to Secretary of State
Majesty' s. Government, and have
er nor
take
51 of 12 March 18572 Secretory of Fute Feshotch from Secre of State We Were Luque 1857.
caused much public scandal _._. and that Mr. Anstey's conduct in reference to these unseemly centroversies has been frequently -
by the Governor and severely.
cendured
animadverted on by Her Majesty: Secretaries of State.
Resolved unani
1
nanimensly (the Acting Colonial Secretary declining to vote.) -
Despatch From Sceritan of State Mr. Wo/21. Hav 1858.
Morney General's litte
in March 1858, regard Mr Forth.
im
Anstry unless he made public reparation To the injured party, Her Majesty's Government declared in an appeal Made by Mr. Anstey to the Secretary of State: that Mr. Anstey had avaited himself of that appear not by expressing his willingness to make the apology " which the evidence brought forward " on behalf of the Chief Justice seemed " to render proper - "declining to give
Nor even
by simply
that apology, but
" by a letter in which he repeats So the charge
on
what I must term
" virulent and offensive language : calculated in as for
AUŠAN
him
"Say to degrade and vilify his ". " superior functionary. And Mr. " Anstey himself repudiates the excuse " that he had only used ordinary.