297
and justifying himself for allowing that Gentleman
to form his acquaintance he proceeds (page 647)
"
It is also true I believe
to
that the Gorrma called on
De Bridges on his return and
actia in
a manner quite
is consistent with in beleef
the malpractice, but
I will sayi
D. Bridges
presenen, that duitriped
the
disgust
and indigen.
tion which D. Bridge himself expressed abs
reception to little uasis- text with the treacting of which he said.
the forma has bun quilty towards him. I that not repeat
the language be and, the
I do not affat prudim, I having stated in an mild
way
its efter. I know that
the Mene wan
Even mus
indignant & so war
ވ
"
t
Now when it is considered
that
all this bedraight by
the Attorney General of mot
Confidential
mmunications
by the
made to him by
Governan
has no ont of relevancy in the matter un
nor any
ཆཙའ་ རབས་ཆ་༼༽ visible abject beyond
that of sowing disend it that even if
to me
appear to
Mr. Andyp revelations we
true he would deverve
dionifone for making them. Lin I. Bowring however gues
a
· totally different account
of what passed (Darparch རི་གན་རྐ་འཐབ།(རིག་ཆ་བརྩགྱིས་ No 97(paragraphe 56.57.58) applying to Mr. Ansky the ! somewhat strong term
unblushing rehemence of
"
mendacity and shaly
-proceeding
to observe that it
hav
#Page 301
1