oney
The first. There is no
evidence that he
wax
guilty of any deception with
regard
to Ma Chow Wong's
papers and it is shown
that shoe papers
were
destroyed by the fovernment
Officer who has change
them (with
the
Panction
Dr. Bridges) simply. because they were in the
and supposed to be
wayy
modefe
In
fact M Mayo
morandum even and
暮
respecting the
own showing demant come to alleged cintrat
much
ao
as agamit Md.
Aldwells
With
regard
to the
facts proved Mr Caldwelli defence is - that ma chow Wong has been his mot useful in former, by n
of whom the Majatly thing
have
read.
ofron popen, 200n Falling his own lection of them shows nothing agt me Casana rod
what is admitted.
(Minted videon (..37.)
I have been enabled to destroy
many pivares and
289
many
usefure discoveries affected fand this is admired) - that
he was in debt to Mr.
Coldwell and that the
only means of securing
the debt was
payment of the
the taking a
share in
Ma chow Wongs locha which
Mr Caldwell retained till
the debt
stas
satisfied (Octob)
Jane
that Mr Carduello
Servant offered himself fr bail to Ma chow Wong
without Mr. Caldwells
having heard a the subject
the servants.
und
and that he
imprisonment for debt
was
was
andy not because he wow penniless, but only because for a few day refused to
paya
elain
he
which
1
1
F