intimately
conner
with thanking that I labhuck?
persono
his
Avent
imprisoned
unsupported information
that Mr. Caldwell (while out of the Government service)
partner with humenna
was
loucha and inson two other
Commmereine transactions
-
that Mr Caldwells servants-
having been recently in prison for debt-
fo
debt slood baie
lum and
that Mr.
Caldwell exerted himself to procure his
acquesial
pardon.
·
It is also true
that Mr. Cardwells
testimony procured in 1837 the discharge of persono said to be connected with
Ma Chow Wong who
and whom in the
were
opinion
of
Proved now.
18020
of
the Commission M288
Caldwell
ought
to have
known to be purares.
On the other hand.
it is not proved that any.
tie by affinity submited between them in that Ma Chow Wongs villanes
were on
the large
large scale
which is indicated - that
Mr Caldwell was in
amy
senve an accomplice in them
or connived at them that he received the
produce of plunder
or that
he harbound Ma chow Wong'
wife. It is
charly shewn that he had nothing to
do with the noble prosequi
which
was entered on
The
acting Law Offin second charge, because
the your mach
the
man was convicted