1
mention- and (1) partly.
M
a recollection (which turno out to be incorrect) of ch Inglis (the present Govern
J
the fare) respecting a
visit which he paid W. Caldwell in 1844 that in 14 year ago (page 28). On
the other hand Mr and
Mrs. Caldwell (for
boch
M. May term
mannen
and demeanour and
the Chu
281
And
Chunch of England. A
it is admitted that sines
her mariage five for longer)
the management of her she has lived quietly and
Househsed were
h
alway
"marked by drist propite
conduct and were that respectably.
It
appears
J'a Fentlewoman page 18 to me that the Committee)
Mr Anstey in saying
1
deal much too gently with
that
there
grounds for
making
this
charge. He
A^^^^---
are examined on
this
point)
declare that the statement
is siply false-
that W.
Caldwell married her according to the Chinese fashion from her mothers
House- that she
wvab
afterwards converted to
Christianity
and that he
then married her again
acending
to the forms of
The
has brought against the
wife of
ove
who may
be
called a
brother officer.
whe
C
beyond...
doubt has been for Birgan
living with strict propriety the charge of having been taken from a brothi - meaning
ao
be explained to the
Legislative Comice that the
"halot: No man
wav
Ch
#
has a right to bring such
a