274
otherwise qualified.
I think the above comparison taken in
connection with No And
Anderp
omission to repudiate
the ch
charges 18 and
18 and 19 proves unequiorcally that he is
responsible for all
changes
in
the
the forement
list- with the
partial
and unimportant exemption of er 12, the
he is bound to establish a
to show that he had strong probable grounds for bringing fall there charges,
and that
he does not speak ingenuously
when he describes the
6.47.12.13 14
charges 6.4. 12. Band
14 as
never made at all
if made,
alleged
eve prosly
to be merely
probable or doubsfue
orherurse
It follows to consider
how far he has established.
all
there accusations,
and in do
doing it will
be convenient not to take them in the order in which they are numbered (which
is the order in which they happen to have been made) but to group them acending to
to their subjects
and in so
doing to supply
what is wanting in order to
what Mr. Anokey
convery
meant and what in
fact the evidence points- to. I showed however
make two on thice prelimining
observations.
Mr Andry objects
to