14
"
actually brought that they
"were not true and 4
abstract of
did
faithfue
cact of what he really
།
say ou
write - some
being studied varities of
ihe
Jame
charge (2.5.14.16
17) - (3.4.6.12.16)-(6.7.9.10.11.12)
some being imperfearly stared " (2.6.7.8.11.12. 13:14-16
and
14)-
some
being mere
inferences from the presumed establishment of the rest"
1.2.3.4.5
2.3.4.5 and 8)-
all
"
on
"
Others "never made at
if made expuply
alleged to be merely probable
on doubifue
on otherwise
qualifia - (6.7. 12. 13. 14.).
༥༤
The
charges
however
submitted without
change
નાના
change
269
to the Committee
of Enquiring and del greputed
themfire
It follows the fire upon. If
to enquire (1) whether Mr. Anotey is really responsible
them-(2) whether for making them. having made
de them he
AASTASI
bound to establish them.
and
how far he hav
-(3) how
fucceeded in
a view to where
os. With
doing so.
༥བའི་མཐག་
it will be convenient I
think to exhibit in
parallel columns (1) the charger
themselves - (2) such
abservations
a
ao
may show how
UAA
far Mr. Anokey responsible
foreach and (3) the
the Court of decision of
Enquiry as to the actant
to which he had established
them
I shree therverquie ho
fam
1