99
98
Attorny beneral. Is
Suspending the Attorney
was summoned to meet at 10 o'clock
and about that hour the accompanying
1
by
Memorandum was received from that Memorandu fficer. This document demands the general,
following
dated bit August, 1888)
observations from me. The N15
protect against the jurisdiction of the
bouncil is repeated with this addition jurisdiction had
Mist Lue
never
cxisted. A statement is made that Aur Anatry had not sufficient time allowed him to prepare his defence because during part of the days allotted employes on heavy
1
to Cim he was professional businen "three whole
"days" according to his letter. Your Minutach
will observe from the Minutes
Connect how even this fact is
Council
249
facts, is capgiraad
on two of the If days there was no Cant business wilterever on the other two days the Court did not it unfl 2. PM. and on one of these best mention.
last
tayo Us! Austigs profeccinal businces
did uré reculy
Calf an buences was private not official and
an sour - Besides his
could carily have been adjourned hid be decid it. I am thus particular in dealing with this houb to show that even to a clow pen man there would have been no hardshin whereas
hardship whereas by a writer of Mur Anitey's estrandway power of excention in evvvving quier
of
of
paper the
the Execution Council of
7th August, 1858. 1949
alligation of
time seemed out
want of
of place.
The