77

Whad Served be And placed hinment Scainid to d

A

کے

milenatal & dim in this keeliminary

litter that unless he sent in

Latifactay acti

A

A

A

reference would

ensue to the reccutive funcil. I

did this undir the idea that Savne

notw mat fairly by him in es dring

and

sand

at havily cxiecting that an exfame act of this description would be ratterested by him to be twisted

ints an

1

irregularity. I away also

its

pien mention that throughout withing the Formission priutile de die in diem but did not communicatī

them to me the proceeding feach day and that as Mr Anstey attended even sitting of the Commuccion with

238

as I am informed it weet five excection

Jam

at

excellias

and as each day he had handed to him the printed writence on his perusal

and his own evidence rccupies purba whole as not lose that 18 pages dur

G

the whole

Anstey might will be expeclid to be

toliantly informed no to the proques of in the same

69. the care.

Attorney Genera Letter

l's

day Mr. Ameliy

returned the answer found in the

Los 4 cerrender and dated July 244. de

24 Jul 1858.

NS.

this letter the

NAUUMés a

Fabian Rolicy

any

and reiterates his repudiation of mur responsibility on accounts of the charges brought gainst the Rejisten benral forgetting apparently & time that he has denied my jurisdiction by

an appeal to the

the

Share This Page