in page 32 that the Attorney
orat in rate Bruvately
beneral had
officially citter in writing or by cond
of
mouth wannen me or the Colonial Scontar,
as My
his
Official chansul of Communication againt Me fuldwell and that finding warnings neglected he had at length out of a sense of public duty been forced ints bringing there charges irregular
Such a presumption is 43. however totally unfounded - 1. Ansiy
tuanmer.
in an
has never bone anything of the ent no
reat as have been Aur Caldwell's Services
great
has he been so
do nic
to warrant
malpractices
necessary
the
to the govemment
Government
any musuunity for
on his part. On one recasion 4.4.
only do I find that
arry
Tints or suspicion
4 1: faldwell's integrity or trustworthines
223
was conveyed to the borements by 104
-
مبر
and this was his request
Austly, and this was his request that Mr Ealdwell might not be advised of that - sunt extraordinary accommendation of Mo. Ansley's that Ich should be eith as a burderer before the Supreme fark on his being brought within the jurisdiction 45. of the Colony - But Mr Anstey's Connels in connection with the poisoning
throughout
Case
were of is extravagant and with an character that I must confers Semnsidend them as aberrations of an
-
an intellect _ on
that matter at least somewhat deranged.
46.
"Equally emprising as proceeding from a high legal functionary is the desertion at page 2 that the change.