قیم
I have arrived at the following
panelusion-
A. Instey being engaged
دمام
trivate Counsel in a cause made
General
Sen
me of his position as attorney & infire the Assistant Magistrate who as Theriff had been presiding Fidge
at the bill of such cause to assint
J
if not to order the arrest for wijnry
the within whine critence had
caused Aur Anstey to sustain a
Mir defent
From the
rom the oppressio
expression of orinion
of the day and from the abandonment
of all charge against the accused
0
am compelled to conclude that
there
was w
ground for such
arrest and that Mr Anstey in
175
womoting it in the first instance must have been labouring undir mistake o irritation in failing to
a satisfactory
verbiet. When I find the attorney
beneral starting
obtain a
to the Jury that he cances Turn Mun to be committed for herjury. I am
comewhat at a love to understand the distinction raiced by him in his Official letter." But it is not truc "Hat I committed the man himulf
(myself) he was committed by
"the Sheriff
uhou luy
Ly
application".
and the more so when I find
M
the Police Shut the name of t=
Anstey
as that of the Person