per anni, paid from
Colonial funds only.
4.
Under these cis=
: cwm Stances, putes 2nd
unless. Clarendon hav
any precedent quay guide him
Which me
Mherwise on this subject,
AV. Labouchure
<
mclined
to think that the Attorney
しか
Hend for Houstong is
entitled to require fees for
services rendered to Her
Majesty's Suferintendenz
in China.
I have, Sc :
"Hall
2
T. Office. 1395. H. Rong
747.
Mr. Weinale.
293
Before we send the propeced
bus . to has setter promthe Foriga Office
Would you
take the trouble to look at
the correspondence - which has been - all - arising out of forgotten by us all-
to Ni
Au reeguing preferred in the Hong Kong Govt. in 1844. & 1849 payment if
the Attorney General,
to scurces performed by him forta
It with not
Board & Ordnance. Escape you that at that peunde the Attorney General received a Salary of £ 1500 per annum, derived from That The Parliamentary note..
now weises £ 1000 per annan £1000,
Officer
receives