then open
a Poll Tax
upon
Freign
the principle of a Immigrants exclusively appears to to serious objections both of Emperial and Enteritional policy and that the application of it might
lead
to serious difficulties with Foreign Pavers
This is quite pist
amy
observation and
As
ct
feueral discriminating
Zax
to would doubtless be
Freign humigrants
rijected to by st. M's Evernment. But really
there is as brand reason for objecting to allow
measure of policy
Immigrants
ว
regard
with
to Chinese
on the ground that if the varias
Lépishrines of the British Colonies were so ilb-
a similar measure to this
would
intvised as to apply European nations with which we have well recognised relation of friendship and reciprocity, they create offence. It would be perfectly idle to treat this objection as equally applicable to the State which is at this manent undergoing fore and devord ratties than allow any hopeans to walk about stre Reets of to most Commercial City. Is lineald venting therefore to treat the last remark in the present repot from the too keen-lighted vision of Lawyer for
emote contingencies,
and should simply informe
vertime
us arising
265
Sie John Barring that as the Vistara Act, which has already been confirme? does not carflist with the direst stipulations of the treaty, st. Ms. Lovement
are not prepared to invite the Colanak
to reconsider the subject.
Cepilative
slature
J. F.1.23 Jany
The whole discretion is about an
And which has been for
confirmed.
mon
Ben a
I think this had bitter be fut
by, though it may
Fight of
级
opinion.
I
aper
year
to mapary not to love
warning couraged in the Law Advices
Am Jan 24
but I Minh The Por:
fprie shobe so informed
1927 Jan
Sir John Bowing should be written to in the terms of the best Paragush of Mo
I do not that it Mest merite necefery & commouente exain with the Дисці Мей
-
M. 28.