of the justices could not but confirm, notwithstanding the revocation of the opinion
which occurred at a still later date than the last of the livo.
w was
ам
I therefore think that, although the opinion utterly wrong and unfounded, amounting in fact to
rgument à specie genus, and star
starcely to that the discovery of these facts
thout importause
is not w
e ad
for the Secretary of State, in considering the question of compensation.
567 //
If Mr. Hudson's error,- or rather that of his counsel - ( Ibid. para. 7. ) on the question= of the decision of the 20th August last being, or not being, open to revision by way of Certiorari or otherwving " as in fact, as he suggests, founded upon any error of His Excellency
in the
Avas
construction and explanation
ou
that
of my opinions point, his case is stronger still ; - the right being
barred by
мого
S.
Ordinance
No. 10 of 1844. I. 7. in regard
of Certiorari, and by the
Page 570Page 571