to every member of tho Le be Counsel, foliciter or
the Community whether or thient Alling
will oftece device to consult Connel before
Commnessing this buit, or after
b
to the
of its Contivy and.
A Soliciter will often wish to fortify, hunzelf.
advisability
by an opinion.
ra
It will
ofter.
все
Many
that
he should inan peat expence in obtaining lidence in deffort of his clients claims. There
the
are rust items to be chayed apaint the
a.ee
defeated party,, and there pre according totties Minsan thing
The changed to move. Here then is the chest danmnified, for as within
Comesse.
mor Solicitor will expend their
his care
labour without recompense, Camust meet with the attention and
success. Aure
suffort necessary
it will perhaps, be well that we refer to our Objection to faction 2 of Ordinance 204 of 1857, which repeals bections 5 and to of the freier Ordinance. These bections provided
tome measure for the positionsqun which
A suiter might be placed by reason ofthe 4th section, by decoting, that he might make a
Mpecial
Ppecial contract withh his Colicitor for extr
Corts, which
be allowed
Inaster
67.1.
A.7
0x545
proof of ducle contract, should
apaint him by the taxing These sections horeau au repeated
and the result will be that if a Coliciter
in bees to Commel
ถ
otherwise
any
expense beyond that which in the discretion of the taxing Marter should be charged to the defeated party, cam though buche exfense
have bene siamed by the express owes may
of the client; be cannot be ferratted to
recover the Amorti
The recuramming section to which we
Object is the 8th, which mats that,
after tender to
/
and refusal by lasery
and
Quemker
Ofther Hongkong Bar of a proses bee according
to the schedule
it shall be the duty of
an
Attorney, if to reprised by his chest, to conduct It will be difficult & to que effect tothis
his case in humor.
well wish wir possible section,
it will be necessary
that the thief butire should in each care
become