therein - His Excellency having determined not to allow "further proceedings against him without reference to the certificates in question. The certificates in question related to the original seizure, and the continuance in possession was based on the supposition that evidence was desired, and that such evidence might be obtained upon search made of the locations where the crime was concerted and accomplished.
For these purposes, it was necessary to prohibit access to the premises except to the officers of Government and in common with them.
249
- justice to Ahlum, his creditors, and all parties having an interest in the effects found upon those premises, it became the duty of the officers in possession to take care of such effects until Ahlum should have been convicted, or, by acquittal, restored to the free exercise of his disposing power.
The refusal of His Excellency to allow any further proceedings here does, in my opinion, not alter the case, so as to render...