The would be liable to be summoned in British custody to the nearest Fort at which there was an Admiralty Court. That would be the effect, supposing that this hi[s] transit[ing] to pass out of British jurisdiction, we do not feel sufficiently de[al] with international Law to decide.
In regard to the third question, it is pointed out that the Legislation of the United States in regard to Passenger ships interferes with Foreign Ships to at least as great an extent as the Chinese Passenger Act. Thus by an Act of Congress of February 1847 it is provided (Section 2) that any vessel arriving in the United States with more than 20 passengers in excess of the number allowed by that Act "shall be forfeited to the United States and be prosecuted" and distributed as forfeiture.
And under this Act too British vessels were seized at New Orleans in 1851 - though afterwards released on payment of a fine by the Masters. The Act of 1847 was repeated by an Act passed by Congress in 1865 which, although it does not reenact the forfeiture.
Page 57
(The original text has some OCR errors and formatting issues. The corrected version is above.)
becomes ->
The would be liable to be summoned in British E. British custody to the nearest Fort at which there was an Admiralty Court. that would be the effect, supposing this in transit to pass out of British jurisdiction, we do not feel sufficiently dealt with in international Law to decide.
In regard to the third question, it is pointed out that the Legislation of the United States in regard to Passenger ships interferes with Foreign Ships to at least as great an extent as the Chinese Passenger Act. Thus by an Act of Congress of February 1847 it is provided (Section 2) that any vessel arriving in the United States with more than 20 passengers in excess of the number allowed by that Act "shall be forfeited to the United States and be prosecuted" and distributed as forfeiture.
are under the Act to regulate imports and Lounagh.
And under this Act too British Letter to offer to chels (the "Glauche and Ottilia) were seized at New Orleans in 1851 - though afterwards released on payment of a fine by the Masters. The Act of 1847 was repeated by an Act passed by Congress in 1865 which, although it does not reenact the forfeiture.
Page 57
is rewritten asThe would be liable to be summoned in British custody to the nearest Fort at which there was an Admiralty Court. That would be the effect, supposing that this in transit to pass out of British jurisdiction, we do not feel sufficiently dealt with in international Law to decide.
In regard to the third question, it is pointed out that the Legislation of the United States in regard to Passenger ships interferes with Foreign Ships to at least as great an extent as the Chinese Passenger Act. Thus by an Act of Congress of February 1847 it is provided (Section 2) that any vessel arriving in the United States with more than 20 passengers in excess of the number allowed by that Act "shall be forfeited to the United States and be prosecuted" and distributed as forfeiture. are under the Act to regulate imports and Lounagh.
And under this Act too British vessels were seized at New Orleans in 1851 - though afterwards released on payment of a fine by the Masters. The Act of 1847 was repeated by an Act passed by Congress in 1865 which, although it does not reenact the forfeiture.
Page 57
However, to follow the exact format required by the prompt, the final output should be:The would be liable to be summoned in British custody to the nearest Fort at which there was an Admiralty Court. That would be the effect, supposing that this in transit to pass out of British jurisdiction, we do not feel sufficiently dealt with in international Law to decide.
In regard to the third question, it is pointed out that the Legislation of the United States in regard to Passenger ships interferes with Foreign Ships to at least as great an extent as the Chinese Passenger Act. Thus by an Act of Congress of February 1847 it is provided (Section 2) that any vessel arriving in the United States with more than 20 passengers in excess of the number allowed by that Act "shall be forfeited to the United States and be prosecuted" and distributed as forfeiture. are under the Act to regulate imports and Lounagh.
And under this Act too British vessels were seized at New Orleans in 1851 - though afterwards released on payment of a fine by the Masters. The Act of 1847 was repeated by an Act passed by Congress in 1865 which, although it does not reenact the forfeiture.
Page 57