260
AGI
are &
requent that in laging
2.
the same before Rev. Secretary Schouchere, you will suggest to him the expediency of disallowing Ordinance in question.
I am,
the
"Your most obedient humble Servant,
Men Meemale
4 Nov 19
This
allend.
is an instance of the inconversmo
the most office practice of sending all paper which raise
any byd question at once
to the Law Advisen, without
any sifting
preparation. The
2. Mice Lan
how sent
Nem
a
Colonial adñame, without reflecting
Nel comil ordinance an dealt with
to our own wiles - now
here according to
or Law actually
it to happens the in
whened Mis
auxiting Meir ansan.
16 Nem 2
with regard to the particular portion clauses of which the Law Advisen disappion: they raise a question of
som little importune. INC. Anstey (a whrern framed the Hong Kong ordinance) was no doubt impushed with the hegunt failure of justice, in funcurtions for perjury, in consiguence of its est being mast out that the avermento perjuriously sworn to were "material." No don't he felt, tout the offence of perging was just The same whether the avements won" matenal"
He therefore compared what he
or no.
considered an imporment
imprarment on the law of England - But the Law Articu say, that colonial law, in criminal ratten, aught not to mosted the limits of the law of England. And unlch Bere are
spavil Coral reasons to the contrary,