Nor Meniale
See 284
12
Son:
Drifting & ver...
the dispute may verbal a Lan home I cannot M Ball hot remark that it is die J Barring und cardless dandling
82
of the affair, Whose two punctilious disputants, which has contributed to the Ch. Justice's continued sullenness. W Lahonchère directed that Ms Ansley should
fin not an "apology you with see by looking at our shaft that the and In carefully Erasid Expression of Uput.
het "public by Anstey of course confines himself to the "expression of repet". but Sir J. B. in communicating it to the C. J. calls it a "satisfactory apology".
Now an "1 "apology" it is not at all- and the C. J. Not having seen or heard it, was naturally convinced that Sir J. B. has let Mr Anstey escape from its discretion too easily
hence this second application to the Set of Stah.
I conclude Lahonchère J. under the circumstances has respicient complied with the directions given? If so, it will be only necessary to say that Sir J. Downing has rightly understood the simply "public" as "official."; & that Mr Anstey has