relation to the Samitang Intinana. That
I do not perceive any particular question is raised for their papers. My decision, and can only refer you to my former Despatches of the 6th Pref. last relating to this Ordinance and of the 13th November last respecting the conduct of the Magistrate. I hope that W. Ravier will have been able, before this Despatch arrives, to send you sufficient
It seems to me clear on the face of the Ordinance that the Legislature intended it to have retrospective effect (so far as relates to buildings commenced before its enactment). But as far as I understand the subject, I am inclined to believe, notwithstanding the opinion of the Attorney General, that the error alleged to have been committed by
Page 379