16
mui: aru
as that gel indicated on the 23d of May with the addition of what is called, a "continuation of the offence charged." Sage Sam advised that there is a clause in the Ordinance which makes every 12 hours continuation of any offence under it, a substantive offence. - The Magistrate however decided that there was no "continuation of an offence where the offence proved, and where the offence presented was different. They adhered to their decision of the 23rd of May and accordingly again dismissed the Surveyor.
Under protection of this, the decision was rendered, and the further history of this oppression is hardly needed, having occurred. It is rendered in my belief that I quitted the property under the protecting both of the Imperial and local laws.
and however, that under this Ordinance, the Magistrates refined by thing Magistrates His Excellency, the Governor, thereupon, pronounced to be quite site.
at under the 12 hours clause. Incredibly a mere "charge" was sufficient towards reopening the Conviction could, against me as they found to be the question, and of accordingly.
to be It appears that in was orderly I took a occasion His Honor the Chief motion the Mandamus to observe collaterally, that, happening to have arrived at the Magistrate's decision, the grounds held those to be construed.
Jon of Willingnce. Be of 1806. It appears was sufficient to hear under the Mandamus, to rehear revise their decisions - They and the reversal.
reversed to was app party to past in. houses in they I had compelled to build were some rep this lancy.
It appears, iz Rome making laze in the middle. they did not off that of the.
11. my king of a charge" before Purveyor General 12 hours Under this was a actable thing the Furnmone "freshy glaway on fresh, applied for against my property to the specification and confine font. They are conspinnach They ceased to be vested in Surveyor discretion of Ther Majesty's Purveyor General!
The cade
Page 326