It which were then before.
༡
/ 203 him
43
It may be that the return of attendances called for by His Excellency, and the remarks made thereon in the memorandum were intended not to form a complaint of neglect of duty against the Justices generally,
but to invest the sittings of the 23rd May and the 2nd [38] of June with an unusual appearance; in that case it is most respectfully to state that the impression conveyed to our minds by that unusual appearance is very different from the impression made upon His Excellency. His Excellency Lees