2-6
2
201
Memorandum demands more particular notice from us as the Justices immediately alluded to therein.
We deem it unnecessary to enter into any discussion at this stage regarding the merits of the cases to which particular reference is made or to the decision at which we arrived after careful deliberation.
If the complainant was dissatisfied, there was recourse open to him by appeals to the Supreme Court.
We cannot however permit the charges and insinuations contained in the Memorandum to pass unnoticed in so far as they do overtly impugn the motives of our actions while sitting on the Bench as Siam, Magistrates.
We observe that in the "judgment of His Excellency" obvious intent and meaning of the Law were allegedly abrogated, and annulled by the actions of the Bench, on the 3rd May and that, on the 2nd June (as officially reported) again strenuous exception was specially taken by the Acting Chief Magistrate and three of the Justices who had been present at the hearing and another Justice who took his seat there