174
Made were a applicable by I. Bowning to proceedin go before Ar Majity Convuls in China and Ordinance account the that unicated him to the Foreign Office and was you fain the opinion of officers of submitted for the Law The Gown in Mr Hammonds Letter the fol November last.
I'm the reply This the 15th of November "The Expreferon below the line is tome arced in the letter be He Solo Ger: ahe was not of Of 2.6. üben t fomir Mincion was given.
I hon anestained at the F.O. that then frziens an sight Bes you recommen recommend that the Ordinance phoned not receive the sanction of Her Majerky, stating that Veveral enactments Ordinance and in particular, the 5th 8th are being at variance with the Law of England and not as it appears to you in their application pestified to the Colony
You Cathery ad dai your "Their that it in devorable