not returned to use from circulation, nor is the volume in which it is contained in his room. It present therefore I can only say that there is little doubt that Mr Auriy predecessors, with large Salaries then be int have, had private practice - that he himself wich have A reduced Salary, & that he will have spare time outer haculs - for I do not think the Commaint ytorey Honey bas hoven shelf ofthony at all litigious & I should they say no hour descer to in this Colony theat the pullée Service from bis being allored private practice.
with positive information on the raised by Mr Ausleys - In I have not Certain notifie Mr Merciale, Jam unable at this is moment to subfly you point before mation of. If I remember right, Sie these P Menger's, which laid down that the Se notification is, or was at referred to M. at liberty to practise.
Ball with some Reaper of Sir J. Bouring alleging & corruption free ad Ifpiers in the has 10196 H.K. Mr Chisholon Anstey is quite right in A raising 416 This question in distinct way to avoid future misunderstanding - In the desk. Is which N Blackwood refen (9850) The former says "it has aluz Zyo been understood that the appointment to the Attorney Generalship does ñ hi bay respect interfere with the immunities of private practice." Its Anstey shower to 10 informed.
And I think the coverpondence should I sent
Page 421