193
i
Country..
this subject in this Count
With respect to the latter part of the
4415 Rule:
This proposes to introduce a
positive and inflexible rule as to the
Costs of
Interlocutory proceedings which
differs entirely from the Rule that exists on
the subject in the Court
Westminster Hall.
For the reasons already
given
we think
beyond his Costs: but this principle is entirely
negatived by the proposed 5 π Rule,
which,
if allowed to stand, would afford
the
means
of easily
evading the rule
of
Remuneration laid down by
Ordinance, and would most probably lead to
much mischief
and
inconvenience.
We cannot therefore approve
of
the 5th
and 6th Rules.
As to the 12th Rule:
The Frame
of
the
besides which the reasons
do not appear to us
this is objectionable;
offered for the change
to be sound or
sufficient.
With respect to the 5 & 6 Section:
The law of England founded on a live
Providence for the protection
of a Suitor to his Attorney pending
Ordinance does not seem to have adverted
to the late Imperial Statute;
by
which
His
promise made or
word given by
before the commencement
of any
or Suit; for remunerating the Attorney
at
any
rate higher than the scale which the
Law prescribes, or giving
any
additional
benefit
The Right Hon
Generally speaking, Costs are recoverable
by
and
if any
against the Client.
Rule
be made at
It
02.
We think
the subject is proper to
be in conformity to
that statute and
the principle of reciprocity.
Labouchere Ill. P.