No Marchurn

Dan on any whats of

the

same thing having been done on

some occasions in H.K. in

remitting

sentence?

or hour on the Luvin' Withing

I have not referred F.M. 728

further back than '50 but I find from that your practice down to the present time it has been customary for the Governor to pardon,

D

Victoros.

Hongkong.

Sir John Bowring

13th December, 1855.

to

Sir G. Molesworth,

1 Inclosure.

No 174.

Receiver

of 16 Prisoners

Replying to

the subject of

10/12 of 10th Sep

the Queen's Birth day, some prisoners;

pardonning none who had committed atrocity, but only those deserving clemency for their behaviour whilst undergoing punishment, or on acct of some favorable features in their cases. On each occasion the Governor furnished the grounds of his recommendation.

68,41 and 7742

Jannes 2 & profiles 68,41

24

reg 3/3.

21

W Ball

$

Sec to Sir G. Molesworth

mit 7796. Acknowledged & stated that he did not intend to interfere with the Governor's discretionary power of relaxing or mitigating sentences on sufficient grounds being shewn, but only to express his disapproval

The manner

by

Mr Merivale

U

1703

But this should have been ascertained before the despatch of No. 10. who sent to his L.B.

In Labouchere

Im

338

Perhaps it will be sufficient to say that you concur with Sir G. Molesworth in his objection to such a practice

1104m

Vergell - I note that I am curious to know on that point. Lytton states that it was usual to release Prisoners on the Queen's Birthday - How, let it be noted.

Must as it is

I have since seen In Labouchere's of They they the chances the that it was the practice with former Governors - Hugh Labouchere expressed to me that it appeared to him that this shore proceeding had been annually customary.

yes - but I show that the form says

Can this be

done? If it is but he should be told or if doubtful - he should be consulted in print, as to the operation -

7244444/

in

which it was done?

Share This Page