has
to
the result, which I lory before you,
Mlory & your Completely satisfied me that Excellency how been misinformed to the facts of the case, and that the Colonial Mutterritics have excreived noe but legitimate jurisdiction in the particular instance under diveusom. I trust that your seelleney with the from Mr.May's statement, written in reply to questione put to brim by the Colonial Secretary, that no samant
L wow demanded by the officer in charge of the "Reindeer", that no warrant was
warrant
recevesary, either by Low-or Luston,
being criminal was not
that the cave
Me
it was necessary
which it was necessary or usual
to take through the Conwill, and that
the course adopted in that invariably followed on all dimilar recasting:
You will ales perecive Hust & very
**
1
2152
great misrepresentation has been made to you, masmuch as the affair of Madion
was not one in which the police head the least interest, still less "did they entrive his release from the "Reindeer", or lend themselves to it, ow Your Excellency, upon what grands I know not, states that you hove
reason to believe.
Equally graudlew in the evorge
trast Madison how been taken into the
Service of this Government.
I'am at a love to reconcile for
"
Excelleney's statement that this is "not the only cave" of this nature","though "the most flagrant", with your sube- -quent
_quent overment that the case is made
exception to the hitherto miversal practice in the Colony ; but, from the "dronments before you, you with fee that