Gereonmuch Rotification

of the 24th May 1844 Which

appears to dispose of the

question you have raised,

and there only to add that no deviation from

the established Rule

should be allowed except by Julian

Zunder

Circumstances of which You must happily be the best judge.

Lo bheuse with respect to the receipt of fees by Public Officers-I see

no reason for making the

Registrar an exception

to the rule already

laid down.

The Govr's enquiry refers to Intestate Estates.

The "note" I refer to relates with testate &

intestate intestacies. If It relates

to fees chargeable when probate &

Letters

of

administration come

All fees on legal

Proceedings

In this

Supreme Court should be paid into the Treasury

by the respective officers, and any attempt to exact extra on Probate fees should be discouraged

by all the officers of Govt.

With respect to Ecclesiastical fees it

appears to me that the "note" to which

you refer supplies the authority

to your argument by showing

that no fees are payable

in testate,

or

intestate cases, either on the disposal of effects.

Share This Page