Admiralty
GENT.
Board
of
Trade
Foreign
Office
38
For Bontan instructed de fauf 50 N 155.
Sir
177. Hong Yong. Foreign Office 4t
1850
January
統 1850
with reference to your letter of the 3 instant stating
325
Earl Grey
is not aware that any Objection exists to the recognition of Mr Lewis Haskell as rice fornitore(?) agent for France at Hong Kong, I am directed by Viscount Palmerston to state that it is not customary that the Queen's Exequatur should be issued in confirmation of the appointment
A. Merivale Esqr.
Page 38
(Some text is missing or unclear, but the above is the corrected version based on the given rules)
Corrected and formatted version in HTML as per the instructions:Admiralty
GENT.
Board of Trade
Foreign Office
38
For Bontan instructed de fauf 50 N 155.
Sir
177. Hong Yong. Foreign Office 4th
1850 January
統 1850
with reference to your letter of the 3rd instant stating
325
Earl Grey is not aware that any objection exists to the recognition of Mr Lewis Haskell as agent for France at Hong Kong, I am directed by Viscount Palmerston to state that it is not customary that the Queen's Exequatur should be issued in confirmation of the appointment
A. Merivale Esqr.
Page 38
However, to strictly follow the format requested by the user, the output should be:Admiralty
GENT.
Board of Trade
Foreign Office
38
For Bontan instructed de fauf 50 N 155.
Sir
177. Hong Yong. Foreign Office 4th
1850 January
統 1850
with reference to your letter of the 3rd instant stating
325
Earl Grey is not aware that any objection exists to the recognition of Mr Lewis Haskell as agent for France at Hong Kong, I am directed by Viscount Palmerston to state that it is not customary that the Queen's Exequatur should be issued in confirmation of the appointment
A. Merivale Esqr.
Page 38