1650 it hit and May [49] 1677 H.K.
they memorialized fort on the council these expenses, & on neither intured to clasp it with a back of faith as they do now. They say indeed now
that additional Evidence has transpired, that it seems
plain that this evidence was
within their reach before.
equally
On the whole, I observe an abstract
only what I must call a questionable partition towards those who have contributed for religious purposes as Hong Kong, I think the formenors which may
that fort shared stand in
I adhered to, and mainly
206
this Case found, that I'frey runh peruse from the tone of former applications on this subject that
the contract was understood at H.K.
for. Donham understand it.
and that the charge of breach of faith is now for the first time attained by change of trustees.
after
2. As to her Clearly, claim the Evidence seems to me quite
sufficient It seems to me that Mr Cleonly
hi!
come to understand it.
uncheck the work on
Fairs)